RESEARCH PAPER
TL and OSL Dating of Sediment and Pottery from Two Syrian Archaeological Sites
 
More details
Hide details
1
Instituto Universitario de Xeoloxía, Universidade da Coruña, Campus de Elviña s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spain
 
2
Departamento de Humanidades, Facultade de Humanidades, Universidade da Coruña, c/ Dr Vázquez Cabrera s/n, 15403 Ferrol, A Coruña, Spain
 
 
Online publication date: 2008-10-01
 
 
Publication date: 2008-01-01
 
 
Geochronometria 2008;31:21-29
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Luminescence dating is widely applied nowadays, mainly for archaeological material and artefacts and sediments of all types and origins. However, optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) from archaeological sediment, originated from mud brick buildings has been hardly studied. The archaeological sites of Tall Abu Fahd and Tall Qsubi are located in the Middle Euphrates Valley, Deir ez-Zor district, Syria. These two Bronze Age sites were recently discovered by a Spanish-Syrian team from the Directorate General of Antiquities and Museums (Damascus) and the University of Coruña. Both sites were dated (about 3.5 ka BC) by typological pottery classification. Sediment and pottery samples from these archaeological sites were collected for luminescence dating. Several analytical procedures for obtaining equivalent doses were tested on the sediment samples. Blue OSL from quartz subsamples and IRSL, post IRSL Blue OSL from feldspar contaminated quartz and polymineral subsamples were performed to obtain OSL ages. For the pottery samples, additive dose TL on a coarse grain feldspar contaminated quartz subsample was performed as well. Results have shown agreement among all the luminescence procedures tested on the Tall Abu Fahd site samples after fading correction, showing ages around 2.7 ka BP. Obtained ages from the other site samples show disagreement among quartz blue OSL and the other subsamples. Fading ratios allow correcting age underestimations from the polymineral post-IR OSL signal. However, the polymineral IRSL signal still shows underestimation. Final sediment and pottery ages have shown good agreement. Older 14C independent age (3.32 ka BP) corresponds to occupational periods of the site while sediment ages are attributed to a post occupation phase.
 
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Montero Fenollós JL, Caramelo F, Márquez I and Vidal J, 2006b. Le projet archéologique Moyen Euphrate Syrie: 2e campagne de prospection dans la région de Halabiyé/Hanouqa (Deir ez-Zor, Syrie) (The archaeological project Syrian Middle Euphrates: second campaign prospecting in the region of Halabiye / Hanouqa - Deir Futowa, Syria). Orient-Express 2006/4: 99-102 (in French).
 
2.
Murray AS and Wintle AG, 2000. Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol. Radiation Measurements 32(1): 57-73, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X.10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X.
 
3.
Poręba GJ and Fedorowicz S, 2005. Gamma spectrometry for OSL and TL dating of loess deposits at Dybawka and Tarnawce (SE Poland). Geochronometria 24: 27-32.
 
4.
Preusser F, 1999. Luminescence dating of fluvial sediments and overbank deposits from Gossau, Switzerland: fine grain dating. Quaternary Science Reviews 18(2): 217-222, DOI 10.1016/S0277-3791(98)00054-7.10.1016/S0277-3791(98)00054-7.
 
5.
Adamiec G and Aitken M, 1988. Dose-rate conversion factors: update. Ancient TL 16: 37-50.
 
6.
Aitken MJ, 1985. Thermoluminescence dating. London, Academic Press: 279pp.
 
7.
Bailey RM and Arnold LJ, 2006. Statistical modelling of single grain quartz De distributions and an assessment of procedures for estimating burial dose. Quaternary Science Reviews 25(19-20): 2475-2502, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.09.012.10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.09.012.
 
8.
Banerjee D, Murray AS, Botter-Jensen L and Lang A, 2001. Equivalent dose estimation using a single aliquot of polymineral fine grains. Radiation Measurements 33(1): 73-94, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00101-3.10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00101-3.
 
9.
Brennen BJ, Lyons RG and Phillips SW, 1991. Attenuation of alpha particle track dose for spherical grains. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements 18(1-2): 249-253, DOI 10.1016/1359-0189(91)90119-3.10.1016/1359-0189(91)90119-3.
 
10.
Grogler N, Houtermans FG and Stauffer H, 1958. Radiation damage as a research tools for geology and prehistory. Convengo sulle dotazioni con metodi nuclear. 5th Internazation Elettr Nucl Sezione Nuclear Roma: 5-15.
 
11.
Hossain SM, De Corte F, Vandenberghe D and Van den haute P, 2002. A comparison of methods for the annual radiation dose determination in the luminescence dating of loess sediment. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 490(3): 598-613, DOI 10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01078-1.10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01078-1.
 
12.
Lauffray J, 1983. Halabiyya-Zenobia, place forte du limes oriental et la Haute-Mésopotamie au VIe siècle (Halabiyya-Zenobia, eastern lime stronghold of and Ninurta at 6th Century). Paris, Geuthner Ed: 295pp.
 
13.
Mauz B and Lang A, 2004. Removal of the feldspar-derived luminescence component from polymineral fine silt samples for optical dating applications: evaluation of chemical treatment protocols and quality control procedures. Ancient TL 22(1): 1-8.
 
14.
Mejdahl V, 1986. Thermoluminescence dating of sediments. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 17: 219-227.10.1093/rpd/17.1-4.219.
 
15.
Montero Fenollós JL, Caramelo F, Márquez I and Vidal J, 2006a. O projecto arqueológico Médio Euferates Sírio: resultado provisórios da primeira campanha (The archaeological project Syrian Middle Euphrates: second campaign prospecting in the region of Halabiye / Hanouqa (Deir Futowa, Syria)). Revista Portuguesa de Arqueología 9: 109-126 (in Portuguese with English abstract).
 
16.
Roberts HM and Wintle A, 2001. Equivalent dose determinations for polymineralic fine-grains using the SAR protocol: application to a Holocene sequence of Chinese Loess Plateau. Quaternary Science Reviews 20(5-9): 859-863, DOI 10.1016/S0277-3791(00)00051-2.10.1016/S0277-3791(00)00051-2.
 
17.
Roberts HM and Wintle AG, 2003. Luminescence sensitivity changes of polymineral fine grains during IRSL and (post-IR) OSL measurements. Radiation Measurements 37(6): 661-671, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00245-2.10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00245-2.
 
18.
Roque C, Guibert E, Vartanian E and Bechtel F, 2002. The chronology of the neolithic sequence at Dikili Tash, Macedonia, Greece: TL dating of domestic ovens. Archaeometry 44(4): 613-633, DOI 10.1111/1475-4754.00089.10.1111/1475-4754.00089.
 
19.
Stokes S, Hetzel R, Bailey RM and Mingxin T, 2003. Combined IRSLOSL single aliquot regeneration (SAR) equivalent dose (De) estimates from source proximal Chinese loess. Quaternary Science Reviews 22(10-13): 975-983, DOI 10.1016/S0277-3791(03)00044-1.10.1016/S0277-3791(03)00044-1.
 
20.
Wallinga J, Murray A and Duller G, 2000. Underestimation of equivalent dose single-aliquot optical dating of feldspars caused by preheating. Radiation Measurements 32(5-6): 691-695, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00127-X.10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00127-X.
 
21.
Wang X, Lu Y and Zhao H, 2006. On the performances of the singlealiquot regenerative-dose (SAR) protocol for Chinese loess: fine grain quartz and polymineral grains. Radiation Measurements 41(1): 1-8, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2005.02.010.10.1016/j.radmeas.2005.02.010.
 
22.
Watanuki T, Murray AS and Tsukamoto S, 2003. A comparison of OSL ages derived from silt-sized quartz and polymineral grains from Chinese loess. Quaternary Science Reviews 22(10-13): 991-997, DOI 10.1016/S0277-3791(03)00053-2.10.1016/S0277-3791(03)00053-2.
 
eISSN:1897-1695
ISSN:1733-8387
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top