CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4 ASIA PACIFIC LUMINESCENCE AND ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE DATING CONFERENCE NOV 23-25, 2015, ADELAIDE, AUSTRALIA
BLEACHING BY BLUE STIMULATION AND X-RAY IRRADIATION RESPONSE OF Al2O3:C TL GLOW PEAKS SEPARATED BY DECONVOLUTION
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Semiconductor Physics, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, South Korea, Korea (South)
 
2
Radiation detection, Radiation Technology Institute, Neosiskorea Co. Ltd., Korea (South)
 
3
Department of Mathematics, Kangwon National University, Korea (South)
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2025-12-16
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-09-01
 
 
Publication date: 2026-10-22
 
 
Corresponding author
DUKGEUN HONG   

Department of Semiconductor Physics, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, South Korea, Korea (South)
 
 
Geochronometria 2025;52(APLED )
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In this study, we separated the TL glow peak of the Al2O3:C sample and investigated the blue light-stimulated bleaching and radiation dose response of each isolated TL glow peak. Prior to these studies, the measured TL glow peaks were corrected for thermal quenching using the pulsed light-stimulated luminescence (POSL) technique based on the Mott-Seitz model. The resulting quenching parameters were W = 1.10 ± 0.02 (eV) and υ = 2.54 ± 1.21 × 1014 (s-1). The Tm-Tstop method was used to obtain information on the number of overlapping peaks in the TL signal corrected for thermal quenching, and the computerized glow curve deconvolution (CGCD) method with applied general order kinetics was employed to obtain the TL kinetic parameters. The glow curves exhibited at least three component glow peaks (197 ± 3 °C, 227 ± 2 °C, and 318 ± 2 °C, denoted as C1, C2, and C3, respectively). In all isolated peaks, the bleaching effect by blue light stimulation exhibited two different exponential decay patterns, including a fast initial bleaching rate followed by a slower bleaching rate, which could be explained by the competition between optical stimulation and phototransfer. In the dose response study, peaks C1 and C2 showed a sublinear dose response, while peak C3 exhibited a supralinear response.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (RS-2025-25396349 and RS-2025-25415913).
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Aitken MJ, 1985. Thermoluminescence dating. Academic Press. London.
 
2.
Akselrod MS and Kortov VS, 1990. Thermoluminescent and exoemission properties of new high-sensitivity TLD α-Al2O3:C crystals. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 33: 123–126, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a080772.
 
3.
Akselrod MS, Larsen NA, Whitley V and Mckeever SWS, 1998. Thermal quenching of F-center luminescence in Al2O3:C. Journal of Applied Physics 84: 3364–3373, DOI 10.1063/1.368450.
 
4.
Balian HG and Eddy NW, 1977. Figure-of-merit (FOM), an improved criterion over the normalized chi-squared test for assessing goodness-of-fit of gamma-ray spectral peaks. Nuclear Instruments and Methods 145: 389–395, DOI 10.1016/0029-554X(77)90437-2.
 
5.
Biswas RH, Bhatt BC and Singhvi AK, 2013. Effect of optical bleaching on the dosimetric TL peak in Al2O3:C for blue and UV emissions. Radiation Measurements 59: 37–43, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.10.003.
 
6.
Bos AJJ, Poolton NRJ, Wallinga J, Bessiere A and Dorenbos P, 2010. Energy levels in YPO4:Ce3+,Sm3+ studied by thermally and optically stimulated luminescence. Radiation Measurements 45: 343–346, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.01.014.
 
7.
Botter-Jensen L, Agersnap N, Markey BG and Mckeever SWS, 1996. Al2O3:C as a sensitive OSL dosemeter for rapid assessment of environmental photon dose rates. Radiation Measurements 27: 295–298, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(96)00124-2.
 
8.
Botter-Jensen L, Mckeever SWS and Wintle AG, 2003. Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimetry. Elsevier Science. Amsterdam, Netherlands. DOI 10.1016/B978-044450684-9/50091-X.
 
9.
Bulur E, Goksu HY and Wahi W, 1999. Phototransferred thermoluminescence from α-Al2O3:C using blue emitting diodes. Radiation Measurements 30: 203–206, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00035-9.
 
10.
Chithambo ML, Sensza C and Ogundare FO, 2014. Kinetic analysis of high temperature secondary thermoluminescence glow peaks in α-Al2O3:C. Radiation Measurements 66: 21–30, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.04.025.
 
11.
Chithambo ML, Ankjærgaard C and Pagonis V, 2016. Time-resolved luminescence from quartz: An overview of contemporary developments and applications. Physica B 481: 8–18, DOI 10.1016/j.physb.2015.10.014.
 
12.
Chithambo ML, Sensza C and Kalita JM, 2017. Phototransferred thermoluminescence from α-Al2O3:C: Experimental results and empirical models. Radiation Measurements 105: 7–16, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2017.08.009.
 
13.
Choi JH, Kim MJ, Cheong CS and Hong DG, 2014. Development of OSL system using two high-density blue LEDs equipped with liquid light guides. Nuclear Instruments and Methods B 323: 19–24, DOI 10.1016/j.nimb.2014.01.016.
 
14.
Dallas GI, Afouxenidis D, Stefanaki EC, Tsagas NF, Polymeris GS, Tsirliganis NC and Kitis G, 2008. Reconstruction of the thermally quenched glow-curve of Al2O3:C. Physica Status Solidi (a) 205: 1672–1679, DOI 10.1002/pssa.200824016.
 
15.
Dogan T, Yüksel M, Akça S, Portakal ZG, Balci-Yegen S, Kucuk N and Topaksu M, 2017. Normal and anomalous heating rate effects on thermoluminescence of Ce-doped ZnB2O4. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 128: 256–262, DOI 10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.07.032.
 
16.
Markey BG, Colyott LE and Mckeever SWS, 1994. Time-resolved optically stimulated luminescence from α-Al2O3:C. Radiation Measurements 24: 457–463, DOI 10.1016/1350-4487(94)00119-L.
 
17.
McKeever SWS, 1980. On the analysis of complex thermoluminescence glow-curves: resolution into individual peaks. Physica Status Solidi (a) 62: 331–340, DOI 10.1002/pssa.2210620139.
 
18.
Kim KB and Hong DG, 2015. Analytical investigations of thermoluminescence glow curve on quartz for luminescence dating. Radiation Measurements 81: 232–236, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2015.01.019.
 
19.
Kitis G, Gomez-Ros JM and Tuyn JWN, 1998. Thermoluminescence glow-curve deconvolution functions for first, second and general order of kinetics. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 31: 2636–2641, DOI 10.1088/0022-3727/31/19/037.
 
20.
Pagonis V, Blohm L, Brengle M, Mayonado G and Woglam P, 2013. Anomalous heating rate effect in thermoluminescence intensity using a simplified semi-localized transition (SLT) model. Radiation Measurements 51–52: 40–47, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.01.025.
 
21.
Topaksu M and Yazici AN, 2007. The thermoluminescence properties of natural CaF2 after β-irradiation. Nuclear Instruments and Methods B 264: 293–301, DOI 10.1016/j.nimb.2007.09.018.
 
22.
Umisedo NK, Yoshimura EM, Gasparian PBR and Yukihara EG, 2010. Comparison between blue and green stimulated luminescence of Al2O3:C. Radiation Measurements 45: 151–156, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.02.001.
 
23.
Yukihara EG and Mckeever SWS, 2006. Spectroscopy and optically stimulated luminescence of Al2O3:C using time-resolved measurements. Journal of Applied Physics 100: 083512, DOI 10.1063/1.2357344.
 
24.
Whitley VH and Mckeever SWS, 2000. Photoionization of deep centers in Al2O3. Journal of Applied Physics 87: 249–256, DOI 10.1063/1.371853.
 
25.
Zahedifar M, Eshraghi L and Sadeghi E, 2012. Thermoluminescence kinetics analysis of α-Al2O3:C at different dose levels and populations of trapping states and a model for its dose response. Radiation Measurements 47: 957–964, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.07.018.
 
eISSN:1897-1695
ISSN:1733-8387
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top